<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Because you weren&#8217;t confused enough: WotC modifies the D&#038;D 4 license deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ogrecave.com/2008/04/17/because-you-werent-confused-enough-wotc-modifies-the-dd-4-license-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ogrecave.com/2008/04/17/because-you-werent-confused-enough-wotc-modifies-the-dd-4-license-deal/</link>
	<description>Unplugged gaming news and views</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: misuba</title>
		<link>http://ogrecave.com/2008/04/17/because-you-werent-confused-enough-wotc-modifies-the-dd-4-license-deal/#comment-4229</link>
		<dc:creator>misuba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 16:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ogrecave.com/?p=2607#comment-4229</guid>
		<description>(That's it, now I'm convinced; the term "meta-gaming" has no meaning.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(That&#8217;s it, now I&#8217;m convinced; the term &#8220;meta-gaming&#8221; has no meaning.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dai Oni</title>
		<link>http://ogrecave.com/2008/04/17/because-you-werent-confused-enough-wotc-modifies-the-dd-4-license-deal/#comment-4228</link>
		<dc:creator>Dai Oni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 08:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ogrecave.com/?p=2607#comment-4228</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“non-fantasy”. Can’t wait to see how that gets enforced.&lt;/i&gt; -- &lt;b&gt;pduggie&lt;/b&gt;

Hopefully with a new edition of &lt;i&gt;d20 Modern&lt;/i&gt;? Otherwise it's going to be like before, everyone have their own ideas of meta-gaming non-fantasy elements (e.g., automatic weapon fire, nuclear blast, etc.).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“non-fantasy”. Can’t wait to see how that gets enforced.</i> &#8212; <b>pduggie</b></p>
<p>Hopefully with a new edition of <i>d20 Modern</i>? Otherwise it&#8217;s going to be like before, everyone have their own ideas of meta-gaming non-fantasy elements (e.g., automatic weapon fire, nuclear blast, etc.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starhawk</title>
		<link>http://ogrecave.com/2008/04/17/because-you-werent-confused-enough-wotc-modifies-the-dd-4-license-deal/#comment-4097</link>
		<dc:creator>Starhawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 05:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ogrecave.com/?p=2607#comment-4097</guid>
		<description>"I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I am altering the deal. Pray I don&#8217;t alter it any further.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Valentine</title>
		<link>http://ogrecave.com/2008/04/17/because-you-werent-confused-enough-wotc-modifies-the-dd-4-license-deal/#comment-4096</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Valentine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ogrecave.com/?p=2607#comment-4096</guid>
		<description>Wow, they are going to make publishers pick the OGL or the GSL.  If you publish a product under one you can't publish the product under the other:

http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=224217

It may be even more restrictive than a product-by-product basis, it may be a publisher-by-publisher basis as to choose the GSL or the OGL, but that was unconfirmed by WotC.

Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, they are going to make publishers pick the OGL or the GSL.  If you publish a product under one you can&#8217;t publish the product under the other:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=224217" rel="nofollow">http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=224217</a></p>
<p>It may be even more restrictive than a product-by-product basis, it may be a publisher-by-publisher basis as to choose the GSL or the OGL, but that was unconfirmed by WotC.</p>
<p>Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pduggie</title>
		<link>http://ogrecave.com/2008/04/17/because-you-werent-confused-enough-wotc-modifies-the-dd-4-license-deal/#comment-4089</link>
		<dc:creator>pduggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ogrecave.com/?p=2607#comment-4089</guid>
		<description>"non-fantasy". Can't wait to see how that gets enforced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;non-fantasy&#8221;. Can&#8217;t wait to see how that gets enforced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James S.</title>
		<link>http://ogrecave.com/2008/04/17/because-you-werent-confused-enough-wotc-modifies-the-dd-4-license-deal/#comment-4088</link>
		<dc:creator>James S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ogrecave.com/?p=2607#comment-4088</guid>
		<description>Y'know at the rate this stuff keeps changing I'm finding Paizo's Pathfinder more and more appealing daily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y&#8217;know at the rate this stuff keeps changing I&#8217;m finding Paizo&#8217;s Pathfinder more and more appealing daily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
