<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gleemax is one dead-ass brain-in-a-jar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ogrecave.com/2008/07/28/gleemax-is-one-dead-ass-brain-in-a-jar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ogrecave.com/2008/07/28/gleemax-is-one-dead-ass-brain-in-a-jar/</link>
	<description>Unplugged gaming news and views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:49:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: misuba</title>
		<link>http://ogrecave.com/2008/07/28/gleemax-is-one-dead-ass-brain-in-a-jar/comment-page-1/#comment-4602</link>
		<dc:creator>misuba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ogrecave.com/?p=2651#comment-4602</guid>
		<description>On reflection, I really wonder if a &quot;cross-training&quot; site for tabletop gamers is really something that people want. I mean, we&#039;ve always been (and will remain) proud cross-trainers here, but I&#039;ve always felt like we&#039;re in the minority amongst those gamers who feel like being Internet-active. That could be a chicken-and-egg problem, of course, and it really only applies to the community aspects of the Gleemax vision.

Lee: we&#039;ve had a couple of ideas on the table for a while along those lines. Probably you&#039;re right, and we don&#039;t need to get all network-y.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On reflection, I really wonder if a &#8220;cross-training&#8221; site for tabletop gamers is really something that people want. I mean, we&#8217;ve always been (and will remain) proud cross-trainers here, but I&#8217;ve always felt like we&#8217;re in the minority amongst those gamers who feel like being Internet-active. That could be a chicken-and-egg problem, of course, and it really only applies to the community aspects of the Gleemax vision.</p>
<p>Lee: we&#8217;ve had a couple of ideas on the table for a while along those lines. Probably you&#8217;re right, and we don&#8217;t need to get all network-y.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Adan</title>
		<link>http://ogrecave.com/2008/07/28/gleemax-is-one-dead-ass-brain-in-a-jar/comment-page-1/#comment-4601</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Adan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ogrecave.com/?p=2651#comment-4601</guid>
		<description>BGG developers aren&#039;t interested in creating a more general community because they&#039;re currently working on another segregated one - RPGGeek. Not that there&#039;s anything wrong with that, but I really liked the promise of Gleemax. I think that it&#039;s something that the gamer community could really sink its teeth into if done right. Of course, I&#039;m a big fan of Facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BGG developers aren&#8217;t interested in creating a more general community because they&#8217;re currently working on another segregated one &#8211; RPGGeek. Not that there&#8217;s anything wrong with that, but I really liked the promise of Gleemax. I think that it&#8217;s something that the gamer community could really sink its teeth into if done right. Of course, I&#8217;m a big fan of Facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Valentine</title>
		<link>http://ogrecave.com/2008/07/28/gleemax-is-one-dead-ass-brain-in-a-jar/comment-page-1/#comment-4600</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Valentine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ogrecave.com/?p=2651#comment-4600</guid>
		<description>As I commented on another thread, WotC seemed to have some network issues on Gleemax and DNDInsider for a while.  I thought it was just me, but I heard it reported by a number of other people.  So, I&#039;m not surprising that between that and the lateness of some of the DNDInsider tools that WotC had to cut something.

Re: your comments on expanding the social aspects of this site, some of the longer comment threads suggest that this site has people occasionally willing to comment on industry issues.  A forum may make such conversation easier.  The GIN does that for a select audience, but it has a poor front end.  Other forums dabble here and there.  But there&#039;s not a great public social site for the industry that encourages talk about industry topics on trends, major news items, and developments.

I don&#039;t know that I&#039;m suggesting that you hack together the Cave&#039;s version of Gleemax, but expanding the site tools would be interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I commented on another thread, WotC seemed to have some network issues on Gleemax and DNDInsider for a while.  I thought it was just me, but I heard it reported by a number of other people.  So, I&#8217;m not surprising that between that and the lateness of some of the DNDInsider tools that WotC had to cut something.</p>
<p>Re: your comments on expanding the social aspects of this site, some of the longer comment threads suggest that this site has people occasionally willing to comment on industry issues.  A forum may make such conversation easier.  The GIN does that for a select audience, but it has a poor front end.  Other forums dabble here and there.  But there&#8217;s not a great public social site for the industry that encourages talk about industry topics on trends, major news items, and developments.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know that I&#8217;m suggesting that you hack together the Cave&#8217;s version of Gleemax, but expanding the site tools would be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
